Graven Images in Worship?
One Text, Many Visions: The Battle Over Divine Images.
One Text, Many Visions: The Battle Over Divine Images.
By Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Girzhel (read bio)
Reading time: 7 min. Impact: Eternity.
For centuries, a profound theological divide has persisted between Catholics, Orthodox Christians, and their Protestant counterparts regarding the use of sacred art (graven images) in worship. This disagreement centers on the use of sculptures, icons, and other visual representations of the divine, particularly of the One True God. Protestant Christians, rooted in their interpretation of biblical texts, often view such depictions as a violation of the Ten Commandments, specifically the prohibition against creating and worshiping graven images (Exodus 20:4-5). They argue that sacred art risks idolatry, diverting devotion from God to material objects. In contrast, Catholics and Orthodox Christians defend the use of icons and sculptures, asserting that these serve as aids to worship, not objects of worship themselves, fostering a deeper connection to the divine. This theological rift reflects broader differences in tradition, scripture interpretation, and the role of visual culture in spiritual practice, shaping distinct worship practices across Christian denominations.
But what is a graven image? A graven image is a handcrafted representation, often carved or sculpted, that embodies spiritual, cultural, or artistic significance. These creations, typically made from wood, stone, or metal, serve as meaningful symbols of devotion, inspiration, or reverence in various traditions. Far from mere objects, they reflect the skill and creativity of artisans, capturing beauty and deeper truths. Graven images can inspire reflection, foster connection to shared values, and enhance sacred spaces with their intricate designs.
But how is it possible to read one and the same text and disagree so sharply? This essay will briefly survey various interpretive groupings of the Ten Commandments to begin answering this question.
Catholic and Traditions
In the Catholic traditions, the Ten Commandments are numbered to emphasize monotheism and moral behavior, with a structure that integrates the prohibition of graven images into one broader commandment that forbids worship of other gods:
In this framework, the first commandment combines the declaration of God’s uniqueness with the prohibition against other gods and graven images. The Catholic churches interpret the graven images clause (Exodus 20:4–5) as a subset of idolatry, not a standalone prohibition as Protestants do. This allows for the use of religious art—icons, statues, and paintings—in worship, provided they are not treated as idols but as aids to devotion. Icons in Orthodoxy and statues in Catholicism are honored as “windows to heaven,” directing the worshiper’s focus to God, not as objects of worship themselves.
The splitting of the coveting prohibition into two commandments (wife and goods) reflects a nuanced moral theology, emphasizing distinct aspects of desire that can lead to sin. This structure underscores the Catholic/Orthodox view that religious imagery, when properly understood, supports worship of the one true God rather than detracting from it.
Protestant Tradition
The Protestant tradition, shaped by the Reformation’s critique of Catholic (and by extension Orthodox) practices, organizes the Ten Commandments differently, with a distinct emphasis on the prohibition of graven images:
Thank you for praying for and supporting Dr. Eli’s ministry!
Protestants separate the prohibition of other gods and graven images into two distinct commandments, reflecting a heightened concern about the dangerous visual representations in worship. The Reformation, particularly in its Calvinist and Puritan strands, viewed religious images as potential idols that risked violating the second commandment. This led many Protestant denominations, especially Reformed and evangelical ones, to avoid statues and icons in churches, favoring plain worship spaces focused on scripture and preaching. The emphasis on the second commandment as a standalone prohibition underscores a theological commitment to God’s transcendence (at the expense of immanence) and the avoidance of anything that might distract from direct worship of God.
By combining two Catholic coveting prohibitions into a single commandment (wife and belongings), Protestantism streamlines its list.
Rabbinic Jewish Tradition
The Rabbinic Jewish tradition offers another distinct enumeration, rooted in the Hebrew Bible and Talmudic exegesis:
In this tradition, the preamble (“I am the Lord your God”) is treated as the first commandment, emphasizing God’s redemptive act in the Exodus as the foundation of the covenant. The second commandment combines the prohibition of other gods and graven images, viewing idolatry as a singular violation. The coveting prohibition is unified, reflecting a holistic view of desire as a moral challenge.
Samaritan Tradition
The Samaritan tradition, based on their distinct Pentateuch, introduces a unique tenth commandment centered on Mount Gerizim, their holiest site, but it is still fascinating to see how they group the commandments, since they too have the Torah as the foundation of their faith.
The Samaritan tenth commandment, drawn from Deuteronomy 11:29–30 and 27:2–8, underscores the sanctity of Mount Gerizim, where Samaritans believe God commanded worship (John 4).
Reflection
The varied interpretations of the Ten Commandments across Christian and Jewish traditions reveal how sacred texts are shaped by culture, history, and theology. Catholic and Orthodox traditions view sacred art as a bridge to the divine, subsuming the prohibition against graven images under the command against false gods, thus embracing icons as “windows to heaven.” Protestants, however, treat this prohibition as a separate commandment, reflecting distrust of visual representations that might overshadow God’s transcendence. This highlights distinct spiritual sensibilities: Catholicism and Orthodoxy embrace God’s immanence through material aids, while Protestantism prioritizes transcendence through simplicity and scripture.
These differences show that the Ten Commandments, though universally significant, are interpreted through diverse lenses. The debate over sacred art reflects not just textual differences but also how communities prioritize divine revelation—visual or textual. This invites reflection on our own interpretive lenses: How do we balance reverence for tradition with openness to other perspectives? How do we decide which way to look at any given theological dilemma?
Could it be that, in the words of Swedish theologian Krister Stendahl, “We are not so much blinded by what we don’t know, but by what we think we know”?
Partner with Dr. Eli today! Whether you choose a one-time gift or a monthly partnership (moderate or large), every contribution (and this is absolutely true!) will impact the lives we will serve together. Click HERE or below.
Comments (39)
I was raised Catholic an alter boy next step priesthood I left because they had no power to take away the guilt of my sins years later hearing Jesus was God come in the flesh I had a hard time believing I saw Jesus on the crucifix in my mind as the dead figure you say basically statues etc. Ok but some pictures show Jesus as a feminist qu--r Isaiah paints a much different picture statue of Mary Joseph the saints who was there to say what they looked like? If God cares nothing of images why did Moses take violent actions against the golden calf God created gold and gave it to the Israelites
Roy, I think the rationale is the Israelites turned away from YHVH Himself, not that they tried to picture Him (though that too would not be right).
Jesus said The hour has come those that shall worship Him shall worship Him with all theiri spirit and in faith so this how He want him to be worship,You don't set any object for his worship.Worship with your soul and your spirit,nowhere even on the cross he never asked his disciples to worship or reference her for worship or used as an intermediary for prayer.
Thanks for your comment.
The question still remains then ARE WE TO HOLD THESE RELIGIOUS ICONS OR STATUES SIGNIFICANT IN OUR MODERN WAY OF WORSHIP?
Ancients were not fools. They knew the image they made was not a god. It was an image meant to attract the god so it could be worshiped, and prayer is an act of worship. So the person needing an idol, even if it is a simple cross in order to focus his attention on God is using it as an idol. Indeed, that is the very definition of an idol! We are made in God's image, and as believers are supposed to be living images of our God. This is why the proscription on idolatry. I have no problem with the cross as a symbol (logo) for Christianity. But if you must kneel before it to focus your prayer, you are using it as an idol. Obviously praying before statues of saints is also idoltry.
Thank you for casting some light on this issue!
The fact that The Lord very soon after the sayings commands Moses to - together with skilled craftsmen - create elaborate structures with rich aesthetics to be used in services and offerings I think speaks in favor of traditional usage of liturgical aesthetics and architecture. The Dura Europos synagogue is another example of how the commandment has been interpreted traditionally.
For those who don't know Dura Europos synagogue in Syria is one of the best examples of iconographic synagogues - <a href="https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=5e581a6313517469&sxsrf=AE3TifNJzxyFFlRq0dzyMDEzwxzXsYd-XA:1758314802172&udm=2&fbs=AIIjpHx8KeeL4pinWNBsyb2wNnV5a8PZmfTOZLSjaWEz0naV4It9RVOItcn1_kZKdZQnsH1WKzDz1MkAbAI8t8xyJFbSAUEk78xZTapLhj6L513E0zESNp9-ZNuBae6m7yaBpj95IuXeHSQ2zolAJ7MB-PIr4M55C4mcyf133HeEd9O_R-H4SxlMJJPcfUJUlzrIeaSw46V3uQ5AGPx19xczfv4DBh2wsuUGa1sWOQOp7VjV_LbBoLM80W_FL0q5njjPt9RNvBX8II1jsOKiPUIzXhKnuYhsqw&q=synagogue+dura+europus&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiS9r6J2eWPAxU43skDHfFkJY4QtKgLegQIGxAB&biw=2560&bih=911&dpr=1" target="_blank" rel="nofollow ugc"><strong>Click HERE</strong></a> for some incredible pictures.
I am so grateful to those of you who have decided to help me grow this ministry! May God bless you and keep you! If you are interested in making a contribution of any size, whether one- time or ongoing, please click here.
Thank you for this. I can see how you're pointing out that combined together, it appears to focus solely on other gods and not YHVH, Yeshua, Ruach haKodesh. I noticed that the lists don't include the entire command. Just so I understand better, why is that? When it says not to make an image of anything in the heavens, are you considering that only the universe, not including YHVH, Yeshua, etc.? I'm excited to get clarity on this!
Any thoughts on the reference to "anything in the heavens"?
When you have a lot of time research this - https://www.thedivinecouncil.com/
Other heavenly powerful beings. Gods and humans were related to places of residence (Divine beings lived in heaven, humans lived on earth).
Chris, I included it in an abbreviated way only for clarity's sake. Hope this helps. The way theologians group really makes a big difference.
I remember Richard Wurmbrandt clarifying it as making ‘unto yourself’ any graven image. It was ok if someone else made it. Growing up Protestant I never faced the issue until traveling to Europe and visiting their old churches. The paintings and sculptures inspired awe in me, both of the artists and the art. It never occurred to me to worship it, only appreciate it. Maybe the difference is in how we approach them, but also to whom we pray. It would also never occur to me to pray to any of them. God gives the talent and He deserves the praise.
Yes.
just a few details: 1. the orthodox tradition is not the same as the catholic one (it is more like the protestant one)... and the protestant one is not unique... there are even those who number the commandments according to the catholic principle (like the evangelicals) which is attributed to saint Augustine...2. also consider it an omission on this topic not to mention the older and longer church tradition before the division into catholics, orthodox, and protestants... and perhaps shed light on this problem from the perspective of iconoclasm which appeared in the 8th and revived with protestantism in the 16th century
šalom
must admit that i am a bit surprised that there are no orthodox here, so as a catholic i must 'protest' (again, maybe was not clear) that the orthodox ten commandments are not like the catholic ones but exactly the same as you stated that the protestant tradition is... my apologies and thanks for your extraordinary impartiality and your bespristrastnost (not so good in english, so try in old slavic)
and blessings
Your are right. I will update the text of the blog.
There is no question that this topic deserves a much longer treatment. Consider it an invitation to do more.
Dr Eli, thank you for these different perspectives of the Ten Commandment through the lenses of these major religions. It really gives me food for thought. Blessings to you and the ministry. May we keep on seeking, keep exploring, digging even deeper into the Word of God.
Thank you so much Sylvia!
Hezekiah destroyed the bronze serpent, called Nehushtan, because the Israelites had started to worship it by offering sacrifices and burning incense to it, turning it into an idol rather than the object of God's healing power. This act was part of Hezekiah's religious reforms to bring the nation back to the worship of the true God, as described in 2 Kings 18:4.
The Original Context
Moses made the bronze serpent on a pole at God's command to save the Israelites from dying from the bites of venomous snakes.
I am so grateful to those of you who have decided to help me grow this ministry! May God bless you and keep you! If you are interested in making a contribution of any size, whether one- time or ongoing, please click here.