Graven Images in Worship?
One Text, Many Visions: The Battle Over Divine Images.
One Text, Many Visions: The Battle Over Divine Images.
By Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Girzhel (read bio)
Reading time: 7 min. Impact: Eternity.
For centuries, a profound theological divide has persisted between Catholics, Orthodox Christians, and their Protestant counterparts regarding the use of sacred art (graven images) in worship. This disagreement centers on the use of sculptures, icons, and other visual representations of the divine, particularly of the One True God. Protestant Christians, rooted in their interpretation of biblical texts, often view such depictions as a violation of the Ten Commandments, specifically the prohibition against creating and worshiping graven images (Exodus 20:4-5). They argue that sacred art risks idolatry, diverting devotion from God to material objects. In contrast, Catholics and Orthodox Christians defend the use of icons and sculptures, asserting that these serve as aids to worship, not objects of worship themselves, fostering a deeper connection to the divine. This theological rift reflects broader differences in tradition, scripture interpretation, and the role of visual culture in spiritual practice, shaping distinct worship practices across Christian denominations.
But what is a graven image? A graven image is a handcrafted representation, often carved or sculpted, that embodies spiritual, cultural, or artistic significance. These creations, typically made from wood, stone, or metal, serve as meaningful symbols of devotion, inspiration, or reverence in various traditions. Far from mere objects, they reflect the skill and creativity of artisans, capturing beauty and deeper truths. Graven images can inspire reflection, foster connection to shared values, and enhance sacred spaces with their intricate designs.
But how is it possible to read one and the same text and disagree so sharply? This essay will briefly survey various interpretive groupings of the Ten Commandments to begin answering this question.
Catholic and Traditions
In the Catholic traditions, the Ten Commandments are numbered to emphasize monotheism and moral behavior, with a structure that integrates the prohibition of graven images into one broader commandment that forbids worship of other gods:
In this framework, the first commandment combines the declaration of God’s uniqueness with the prohibition against other gods and graven images. The Catholic churches interpret the graven images clause (Exodus 20:4–5) as a subset of idolatry, not a standalone prohibition as Protestants do. This allows for the use of religious art—icons, statues, and paintings—in worship, provided they are not treated as idols but as aids to devotion. Icons in Orthodoxy and statues in Catholicism are honored as “windows to heaven,” directing the worshiper’s focus to God, not as objects of worship themselves.
The splitting of the coveting prohibition into two commandments (wife and goods) reflects a nuanced moral theology, emphasizing distinct aspects of desire that can lead to sin. This structure underscores the Catholic/Orthodox view that religious imagery, when properly understood, supports worship of the one true God rather than detracting from it.
Protestant Tradition
The Protestant tradition, shaped by the Reformation’s critique of Catholic (and by extension Orthodox) practices, organizes the Ten Commandments differently, with a distinct emphasis on the prohibition of graven images:
Thank you for praying for and supporting Dr. Eli’s ministry!
Protestants separate the prohibition of other gods and graven images into two distinct commandments, reflecting a heightened concern about the dangerous visual representations in worship. The Reformation, particularly in its Calvinist and Puritan strands, viewed religious images as potential idols that risked violating the second commandment. This led many Protestant denominations, especially Reformed and evangelical ones, to avoid statues and icons in churches, favoring plain worship spaces focused on scripture and preaching. The emphasis on the second commandment as a standalone prohibition underscores a theological commitment to God’s transcendence (at the expense of immanence) and the avoidance of anything that might distract from direct worship of God.
By combining two Catholic coveting prohibitions into a single commandment (wife and belongings), Protestantism streamlines its list.
Rabbinic Jewish Tradition
The Rabbinic Jewish tradition offers another distinct enumeration, rooted in the Hebrew Bible and Talmudic exegesis:
In this tradition, the preamble (“I am the Lord your God”) is treated as the first commandment, emphasizing God’s redemptive act in the Exodus as the foundation of the covenant. The second commandment combines the prohibition of other gods and graven images, viewing idolatry as a singular violation. The coveting prohibition is unified, reflecting a holistic view of desire as a moral challenge.
Samaritan Tradition
The Samaritan tradition, based on their distinct Pentateuch, introduces a unique tenth commandment centered on Mount Gerizim, their holiest site, but it is still fascinating to see how they group the commandments, since they too have the Torah as the foundation of their faith.
The Samaritan tenth commandment, drawn from Deuteronomy 11:29–30 and 27:2–8, underscores the sanctity of Mount Gerizim, where Samaritans believe God commanded worship (John 4).
Reflection
The varied interpretations of the Ten Commandments across Christian and Jewish traditions reveal how sacred texts are shaped by culture, history, and theology. Catholic and Orthodox traditions view sacred art as a bridge to the divine, subsuming the prohibition against graven images under the command against false gods, thus embracing icons as “windows to heaven.” Protestants, however, treat this prohibition as a separate commandment, reflecting distrust of visual representations that might overshadow God’s transcendence. This highlights distinct spiritual sensibilities: Catholicism and Orthodoxy embrace God’s immanence through material aids, while Protestantism prioritizes transcendence through simplicity and scripture.
These differences show that the Ten Commandments, though universally significant, are interpreted through diverse lenses. The debate over sacred art reflects not just textual differences but also how communities prioritize divine revelation—visual or textual. This invites reflection on our own interpretive lenses: How do we balance reverence for tradition with openness to other perspectives? How do we decide which way to look at any given theological dilemma?
Could it be that, in the words of Swedish theologian Krister Stendahl, “We are not so much blinded by what we don’t know, but by what we think we know”?
Partner with Dr. Eli today! Whether you choose a one-time gift or a monthly partnership (moderate or large), every contribution (and this is absolutely true!) will impact the lives we will serve together. Click HERE or below.
Comments (39)
That was excellent. I love the quote at the end too by Kristen Stendahl.
Hosea 4:4-6 NASB2020
[4] ¶Yet let no one find fault, and let no one rebuke; For your people are like those who contend with a priest. [5] So you will stumble by day, And the prophet also will stumble with you by night; And I will destroy your mother. [6] My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge. Since you have rejected knowledge, I also will reject you from being My priest. Since you have forgotten the Law of your God, I also will forget your children.
This passage sprung to mind. We need not just knowledge but wisdom and an understanding heart. What Solomon prayed and God gave.
Idolatory is not just worshipping images but rather allowing something to take God's place in our lives.
Did Jewish tradition in the time before Jesus, allow for objects in the temple or synagogues that were prayed to or kneeled to in veneration, or for assisting in worship?
Many thanks for your question, Martha! As far as I am concerned, this should be the starting point for any believer’s reflection (without any theological framework) on this matter: What were people doing in the time of Jesus, and more broadly, up until the destruction of the Second Temple?
In Jewish tradition before Jesus, objects in the Temple or synagogues were not prayed to or kneeled to in veneration. The Temple in Jerusalem housed sacred items like the Ark of the Covenant, menorah, and altar, which served as focal points for worship directed to God alone. These objects were not worshiped but symbolized God’s presence or facilitated rituals, such as sacrifices or incense offerings, as prescribed in the Torah. Synagogues, emerging later, contained Torah scrolls, which were revered as containing God’s word but not worshiped. Kneeling or bowing was directed toward God, often facing Jerusalem or the Temple, not objects. The emphasis was on monotheistic worship, with strict prohibitions against venerating physical items, ensuring that devotion remained solely for God.
I think I will play it safe and avoid things that might be bowed down to or worshipped, but even then the heavenly bodies are still in the sky and I've seen some pretty amazing naturally formed rocks/mountains/trees that some might bow down to, so I think the main thing is the not worshipping or bowing down to these things.
I believe the Judges 8:27 nails it- the gold ephod, the bronze serpent were "snares" causing all Israel to prostitute themselves, no "graven image" no snare, a good policy or guard rail around the commandment! Even the altar built with good intent by the 2.5 tribes almost caused war between the tribes of Israel as the 9.5 tribes saw it as an evil thing at first. Best to worship God the way God says to worship Him and not add to it or take away from it- I try to do bible things in bible ways as best I can understand while living in the world (Babylon), relying in revelation from the Holy Spirit to give spiritual discernment.
Thank you for your comment.
I am doing the same :-)
Judges 8:27 Gideon made the gold into an ephod, which he placed in Ophrah, his town. All Israel prostituted themselves by worshiping it there, and it became a snare to Gideon and his family. 2Kings 18:4 He removed the high places, smashed the sacred stones and cut down the Asherah poles. He broke into pieces the bronze snake Moses had made, for up to that time the Israelites had been burning incense to it. (It was called Nehushtan.) Joshua 22:23 If we have built our own altar to turn away from the Lord and to offer burnt offerings and grain offerings, or to sacrifice fellowship offerings on it, may the Lord himself call us to account.
Laurence, thanks. Can you clarify why you list these texts in your comment?
I believe as a disciple of Jesus Christ our Lord not in any way look down or Judge other believers brothers and sisters. Otherwise those kinds of questions should be left with God Himself according to the holy Bible in Matthew 7:1--
Blessings!!
I am so grateful to those of you who have decided to help me grow this ministry! May God bless you and keep you! If you are interested in making a contribution of any size, whether one- time or ongoing, please click here.
When was the graven image first mentioned in scripture? What reason did the people have for its creation? Did they have a focus on G-d or an image? Should scripture defend, interpret or define its meaning? I believe the Book is clear, images are out..
Thank you for your questions.
The biggest problem in Catholicism with graven images is NOT what was explained in the essay. The "graven images" that are made in the likeness of men to represent the "Saints" honored by the Catholic church. I was raised Catholic and can testify that people pray TO THE SAINTS, many for help, some to ask them to go before God for them. Praying to the image of a man IS idolatry. Christ alone stands before God for us. We are directed to come "boldly before the throne" as believers in Christ's sacrifice & redemption. Never in scripture are we directed in any way to pray for ANYONE ELSE TO INTERCEDE FOR US. Because of this, the Catholic tradition of actually praying, talking to "the saints" is an a front to God.
Brenda, whether or not asking saints (believers already in heaven) to pray for you is a good idea or not is a topic of a different study. Here are some of my initial thoughts - https://jewishstudiesforchristians.com/can-we-ask-mary-and-the-saints-to-pray-for-us/
I believe the scriptures are very clear, No matter how it's numbered.
We are not to worship any images of any kind.
I think you missed the point of the article. Well... perhaps you proved it. I am not sure. :-)
Scripture interprets Scripture. God commanded the Great Sea to be mounted on the backs of 12 bulls (the sacred image of Baal). God commanded very large Cherubim on each side of the Ark and more cherubim elsewhere, pomegranates and other sacred flowers. The Tabernacle and Temple had images and statues. Therefore the Calvanist Bible centered concept is judged incorrect by the words of the Bible itself. Most heresy is Word of the Bible based. It is based on elevating one passage over another using human logic as superior to God's Divine complexity.
The claim that God commanded images like the Great Sea on 12 bulls, cherubim, pomegranates, and other sacred symbols in the Tabernacle and Temple is partially accurate but requires nuance. Scripture does describe the "molten sea" resting on 12 bronze oxen (1 Kings 7:25; 2 Chronicles 4:4), cherubim on the Ark of the Covenant (Exodus 25:18–20), and woven into Tabernacle curtains (Exodus 26:31). Pomegranates and floral designs also adorned the Temple (1 Kings 7:18–20). These were divinely sanctioned for worship but not as objects of veneration, unlike Baal’s images, which were idolatrous (Exodus 20:4–5). The Calvinist view, emphasizing sola scriptura, doesn’t inherently reject these descriptions but warns against idolatry, aligning with Deuteronomy 5:8–9. Elevating one passage over another risks oversimplification, but heresy often stems from misinterpretation, not Scripture itself. The Bible’s complexity demands balanced exegesis, not human logic alone (2 Timothy 3:16).
I've never been able to decide whether I'm a Cathestant or a Protolic but I'm definitely some sort of mixture of Catholic and Protestant. My difficulty with images is not in what they convey but in what they fail to convey. By failing to convey the reality that is God He is necessarily diminished in my mind and thereby place me in danger of idolatry making God less than he is.
The New Testament, written in Greek, uses specific terms to describe Jesus as the "icon" or image of God, emphasizing His divine representation. Colossians 1:15 declares, "He is the image [εἰκών] of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation," highlighting Christ’s role as the visible manifestation of God’s nature. Similarly, 2 Corinthians 4:4 states, "...Christ, who is the image [εἰκών] of God," underscoring His revelation of divine glory. Hebrews 1:3 complements this, describing Jesus as "the radiance of His glory and the exact representation [χαρακτήρ] of His nature," portraying Him as the precise imprint of God’s essence. These passages—Colossians 1:15, 2 Corinthians 4:4, and Hebrews 1:3—form the scriptural foundation for understanding Jesus as the perfect "icon" of God, embodying and revealing the divine in human form, central to Christian theology.
I am so grateful to those of you who have decided to help me grow this ministry! May God bless you and keep you! If you are interested in making a contribution of any size, whether one- time or ongoing, please click here.