Trading future leadership for a bowl of stew
Examine the Hebrew text of one of the most puzzling stories ever told.
Examine the Hebrew text of one of the most puzzling stories ever told.
By Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Girzhel (read bio)
Reading time: 7 min. Impact: Eternity.
One of the pivotal moments in the life of Jacob, a central figure chosen by God to lead the nation of Israel, is his deceptive act of impersonating his brother Esau. We’ll explore that event later, but for now, let’s focus on the earlier, related incident: Jacob’s request for Esau to sell his birthright and Esau’s motivation for selling it.
God’s Word to Rebekah
After Abraham’s death, Genesis shifted to the story of Isaac and Rebekah, setting the stage for the main narrative of the entire Book of Genesis—the life of Jacob and his children. Isaac was 40 when he married Rebekah. Like several significant women in the Bible, Rebekah struggled with infertility. At Isaac’s plea, God blessed Rebekah, and she conceived. By the time Esau and Jacob were born, Isaac was 60, meaning the couple endured 20 years of barrenness. During her pregnancy, Rebekah felt intense movement. She did not know it at the time, but two of her twins were wrestling/fighting in her womb. Confused, she sought God’s guidance (the text doesn’t specify how or through whom). God’s response was cryptic; at least in the version available to us in the Book of Genesis, it is complicated by the Hebrew’s vocabulary and unusual grammar:
The Lord said to her, “Two nations are in your womb; And two peoples will be separated from your body; And one people will be stronger than the other; And the older will serve the younger (וְרַב יַעֲבֹד צָעִיר, pronounced: v’rav ya’avod tza’ir)” (Gen 25:23).
“When the boys grew up, Esau became a skillful hunter (אִישׁ יֹדֵעַ צַיִד, pronounced: ish yodea tza’yid), a man of the field; but Jacob was a civilized man (אִישׁ תָּם, pronounced: ish tam), living in tents. Now Isaac loved Esau because he had a taste for game (צַיִד בְּפִיו, pronounced: tza’yid b’fiv); but Rebekah loved Jacob.” (Gen 25:27-28)
The ancient world valued Esau’s ruggedness, skill as a hunter, and his strength and survival instincts. Jacob, by contrast, was more refined, staying close to home (“תָּם” (tam) is an adjective that can be variously translated as “blameless,” “simple,” “wholehearted,” or even “perfect”). The text notes a parental divide: Isaac favored Esau, likely due to his love for hunting, while Rebekah was closer to Jacob, perhaps because Jacob was simply around more often.
Rebekah’s faith, fear, and confusion
Rebekah’s actions suggest she was unaware of something Isaac knew: There were two distinct blessings. The first blessing, meant for Esau but obtained by Jacob through deception, was the blessing of the firstborn. This blessing focused on material prosperity and clan leadership:
“Now may God give you of the dew of heaven, and of the fatness of the earth, and an abundance of grain and new wine; may peoples serve you, and nations bow down to you; be master of your brothers, and may your mother’s sons bow down to you. Cursed be those who curse you, and blessed be those who bless you” (Gen 27:28-29).
The second, far more significant blessing was the covenantal blessing of Abraham, which Isaac intended to give to Jacob from the beginning. He later gave Jacob the blessing before sending him to Paddan-aram to hide from his brother’s fury:
“May God Almighty bless you and make you fruitful and multiply you, so that you may become a multitude of people. May He also give you the blessing of Abraham, to you and to your descendants with you, so that you may possess the land where you live as a stranger, which God gave to Abraham” (Gen 28:3-4).
As Jacob, now a fugitive from Esau’s anger, slept on a stone and dreamed of a stairway to heaven, God reaffirmed this Abrahamic blessing he already received from his father:
“I am the Lord, the God of your father Abraham and the God of Isaac; the land on which you lie I will give to you and to your descendants. Your descendants will also be like the dust of the earth, and you will spread out to the west and to the east, and to the north and to the south; and in you and in your descendants shall all the families of the earth be blessed” (Gen 28:13-14).
When you finish reading this article, please make your contribution to help grow this ministry and reach more people. You can do so even now by clicking HERE and continue once you have done so. Dr. Eli will be very grateful!
Rebekah’s organization of Jacob’s deception to secure the blessing (Gen 27) may have been further influenced by Esau’s marriages to two Hittite women, which had already caused her and Isaac significant distress (Gen 26:34–35). These marriages likely brought great disappointment in Esau, but perhaps more significantly, they sparked fear for the small covenant community they still called family. If their future family leader could not guide his wives to honor his parents, how could he be qualified to lead them all?
In other words, Rebekah may have feared the additional turmoil that these women—and their elevated status—might bring to the clan if Esau, as the firstborn, assumed his inheritance and rights. Their prominence within the family could have made this distress worse, prompting Rebekah to ensure that Jacob received the blessing of the firstborn instead.
Esau’s Irrational Choice
The narrative quickly shifts to Esau returning exhausted and famished from a hunting trip, as he and his team were the clan’s primary providers. Jacob, likely anticipating this opportunity, may have strategically timed the cooking to control the family’s food distribution.
We read:
“Esau said to Jacob, ‘Please let me have a swallow of that red stuff there, for I am famished’ (הַלְעִיטֵנִי נָא מִן-הָאָדֹם הָאָדֹם הַזֶּה כִּי עָיֵף אָנֹכִי, pronounced: hal’iteini na min-ha’adom ha’adom hazeh ki ayef anochi)” (Gen 25:30).
The Hebrew vividly captures Esau’s desperation, literally pleading, “Feed me this red, this red thing, because famished I am.” This impulsive demand for the red lentil stew earned him the name Edom (אֱדוֹם, pronounced: Edom), linked to the Hebrew word for red, and his descendants became known as Edomites (red ones). The Hebrew word for “feed me” is used only once in the entire Bible. Many centuries later, in some Rabbinic discussions, this particular Hebrew word for “eating/feeding” (הַלְעִיטֵנִי) eventually came to mean something like “stuffing food into the mouth of an animal.” Given the wording “red, that red thing,” it is highly likely that even back in Genesis, it (הַלְעִיטֵנִי) referred to an undignified way of eating, which is related to the concepts of “gulping” and “devouring.”
The text continues:
“Jacob said, ‘First sell me your birthright.’ Esau said, ‘Behold, I am about to die; so of what use then is the birthright to me?’” (Gen 25:31-32).
In an irrational and bizarre turn of events, Esau agrees to Jacob’s unreasonable demand. Exaggerating his hunger, he prioritizes immediate relief from his hunger and fatigue over his future role as a leader. In other words, he opts for quick, tangible relief now instead of embracing his future blessed responsibility. Beyond family leadership, this role also included a double portion of the inheritance (Deut 21:17). Doubting Esau’s seriousness, Jacob insists on confirmation:
“Jacob said, ‘First swear to me’; so he swore to him, and sold his birthright to Jacob. Then Jacob gave Esau bread and lentil stew; and he ate and drank, and got up and went on his way. Thus Esau despised his birthright” (Gen 25:33-34).
The Hebrew emphasizes Esau’s cavalier attitude with a rapid sequence of verbs: “he ate, he drank, he got up, he went” (וַיֹּאכַל וַיֵּשְׁתְּ וַיָּקָם וַיֵּלַךְ, pronounced: vayyo’khal vayyesht vayyakom vayyelakh). This brisk phrasing highlights Esau’s indifference, as if the transaction were inconsequential. He behaved as if nothing had happened. The narrative, however, concludes starkly, “Thus Esau despised his birthright” (וַיִּבֶז עֵשָׂו אֶת-הַבְּכֹרָה, pronounced: vayyivez Esav et-hab’khorah), focusing on Esau’s reckless dismissal of his privileged status.
Conclusion
In the intricate story of Jacob’s life, we find a tapestry of divine promise and human imperfection, offering profound lessons for our journeys. Rebekah, stirred by God’s prophecy that “the older will serve the younger,” acted with faith, but perhaps also being driven by fear of Esau’s reckless choices and troubling marriage unions. Esau, in his hunger, traded his birthright for a fleeting bowl of stew, a stark reminder to value enduring opportunities over temporary satisfactions. Jacob, originally named for grasping his brother’s heel, embodies persistence, yet his path to true blessings shows that divine plans prevail despite our human flaws. Life’s struggles, like the twins’ battle in Rebekah’s womb, may seem chaotic, but they make us who we are and shape our destinies. Let us choose wisely, holding fast to God’s promises with patience, but at the same time trusting Him that even our missteps can lead to blessed horizons, where God’s presence will guide us toward true purpose and calling. To read Part II of this study (Blessing Stolen and Returned), click here.
Partner with Dr. Eli today! Whether you choose a one-time gift or a monthly partnership (moderate or large), every contribution (and this is absolutely true!) will impact the lives we will serve together. Click HERE or below.
Comments (42)
the biggest challenge for we who cannot read the scriptures in the original languages means we have to rely on what we have ie. scripture translation, which are produced with possible hidden biases the challenges of putting into understandable English a languages that is dead and had only approximately 8000 words in its vocabulary.
I have been skirting around the edges of attempting to understand Hebrew for quite a number of years. I subscribe to a Hebrew scholars daily blog where he takes one word and dissect it so as to give ordinary people an understanding of the vagaries of the word meaning in its context which is king as far as he is concerned. Dr Eli love it so keep it up mate
Thank you, Greg! will do!
It gave me insight and understanding of this story. I had always felt sorry for Esau, But now I know the background to why Rebekah did what she did. thank you Dr. Eli
Yes.
Agreed! This story is indeed troubling (and, therefore, especially engaging). It never fails to challenge upon a new reading. Thank you for sharing your ideas.
The story reads like a three-act play (Isaac's family in Canaan, Jacob's in Padan-Aram, Jacob's return). Something that has long intrigued me is near the end of the first act, in
Gen. 28:8-9 , "And *seeing that his father Isaac disapproved of the Canaanite women, Esau went to Ishmael* and married Mahalath, the sister of Nebaioth and daughter of Abraham’s son Ishmael, in addition to the wives he already had"
His taking more of the same kind of wives showed further what Jacob and Rebekah already knew: he was in no shape to lead the family in their covenant with God.
The story can take on quite different interpretations based on how we glue together the facts with assumptions. Two very different views are equally supported.
1) Esau took a third wife, possibly without his parents' knowledge or assent, to the detriment of the family and purposely further angering his parents.
2) Esau, upset over his parents' disappointment, went to family (cf Isaac, Jacob) to take a wife more suitable. (scripture never tells of any rift between Isaac and Ishmael, they come together to bury Abraham, but yet we are told that Ishmael's descendants were enemies to their kin)
He definitely did it, as we say this in Hebrew, DAVKA, :-) meaning on purpose and to get back at them.
"reflecting a partial shift toward familial expectations, though still not fully within the preferred lineage"
Oh, wow, just imagine what would have happened if Esau had instead gone the other direction and headed to Padan Aram to find a pleasing wife, arriving there right on Jacob's heels. Yikes!
Ya. Its good he didn't go :-)
We view the idea of "local" differently. They were living right among the Hittites, around Hebron, where Esau apparently found his Hittite wives.
But the text says that when seeking a third wife, Esau "went to Ishmael", who was their nearest Abrahamic family living down in Paran. Esau married a cousin, as did Isaac and as Jacob was headed off to do as well at his parents' instruction.
So, working from the text, this third marriage seems to me more a change to please parents and revert to family tradition than a "doubling down" (or tripling, actually).
Neville, I think you convinced me. Esau married Ishmaelite women, descendants of Abraham’s son Ishmael, likely located in the Negev or Sinai, further south. The move aligns more with his parents’ wishes, as Ishmaelites were closer kin to Abraham’s line than Hittites, reflecting a partial shift toward familial expectations, though still not fully within the preferred lineage. So perhaps this was an attempt to remedy instead of double down.
I could certainly see that understanding if the text said that he married yet another Hittite wife. Is there some clue hidden in the Hebrew wording that indicates this (with-malicious-intent) understanding? This is one that I would definitely like to sort out in my often-confused brain.
One of the reasons Rebekah didn't want him to have the blessing of the firstbornis the two Hittite wives. He knew that. So he went out and married some other locals (that he probably already liked/wanted), knowing that this will further upset his parents.
Hi thank you dr Eli for the “ truth” older … Hebrew meaning “abundant one” - I have a whole new view re. the 2 brothers and the whole story changed for me. Great story - Blessing is a key 🗝️ in God’s kingdom and covenants is Yes and Amen - enjoyed reading both articles - significant to get the “original” context - much appreciated ✅
Emily, thank you for all you do! Blessings!
If someone has already mentioned this, I apologize for the repetition.
Should we make anything of the fact that Israel (Jacob) was ruled by Essau (Edom) for a century, when the Herods held the throne in Israel?
No one mentioned it. However, Herods’ rule stemmed from Roman backing, not Edomite power, and their Jewish identity post-Hasmonean conversion dilutes the connection. Now, Edom/Rome connection was made by the Rabbis, but it is symbolic and theological not historical.
I definitely agree with the “post-Hasmonean dilution” and would go even farther and point out that the Hasmoneans were actually usurpers to the throne themselves as they were not of the house of Judah and the Davidic line. Political machinations w.r.t. Rome and Edom notwithstanding, my intended point was that during that century-or-so, the acting King of Israel was an Edomite, so they served him in that position. It might mean nothing w.r.t. the prophecy about the twins but it did happen and is an interesting chapter (maybe a footnote?) in the history of Israel.
I am so grateful to those of you who have decided to help me grow this ministry! May God bless you and keep you! If you are interested in making a contribution of any size, whether one- time or ongoing, please click here.
It is clear from the biblical accounts that Abraham died earlier (2123) than Shem (2156). Actually, Shem takes a back stage. What would be the most probable reason Shem outlived most of the generations after him except Eber, Isaac and Jacob?
David, how is this connected?
The scheming of both Jacob and Rebekah appear anything but Godly, However, Rebekah's foresight of Esau's choice of brides (potential mothers of their descendants), being unholy alliances, realised what would bring a curse rather than blessing on their people. Jacob, too, obviously valued the true blessing of God, and was prepared to act boldly for it. In the same way, our steps of faith, especially acting on God's Word can be seen as not doing the "Christian" thing! We must be guided by the Spirit, as well as the Word of God, not just following religious protocols!
Thanks, Robyn!
Thank you so much. It worth reading
May the Lord bless you, Bartholomew.
Thank you
Stay tuned, Bosse, part II is coming soon.
For me as a non Jew, not understanding the culture and language of the Bible times, this for me is really a revelation to read the interpretation and understand the story behind the story! Thank you
Dear Marietjie, I assure you it is not that you are not a Jew. It is that you haven't studied Jewish background and Hebrew language. I can assure you that someone without any Jewish background, after studying, is just as capable of seeing things others don't. So for everyone out there thinking about getting more serious - do not let a family lineage stop you!
I am so grateful to those of you who have decided to help me grow this ministry! May God bless you and keep you! If you are interested in making a contribution of any size, whether one- time or ongoing, please click here.